Sunday, September 30, 2012

Amazon Dips on Bloomberg Story of Low ‘Prime’ Subscribers

Shares of Amazon.com (AMZN) took a sharp dive to a low of $186.10 a short while ago but are now recovering, down 87 cents, or half a point, at $190.72, after Bloomberg’s Edmund Lee and Danielle Kucera reported that the company has garnered only 3 million to 5 million subscribers for its “Prime” member service, lower than the 10 million analysts have been estimating.

The authors, citing anonymous sources, write that Amazon hopes to reach 7 million to 10 million in the next 12 months.

Prime gives subscribers benefits such as free shipping and all-you-can eat video rentals.

fin.

Trading Volumes Slack, Market Sputtering

In Ireland, the government is collapsing (I am not a scholar of Irish politics; the correct verb tense may be “has collapsed”) as Prime Minister Brian Cowen resigned as head of his party last week and the Greens party pulled out of the ruling coalition on Sunday.

The country is now scrambling to pull together a coalition that will be able to pass a budget before near-term elections (which CNN tells me are most likely going to be held on February 25th). The current estimate is that the austerity budget will be passed by the coming weekend, but that isn’t really the important point. At this point, the government is just passing legislation to support the promises it made to the EU in exchange for a bailout. But this is very different from the decisions which will face the new government that takes shape after elections. It isn’t at all clear that that government, freshly elected and not feeling as much ownership over the deal – and perhaps peopled with more populist members – will still favor accepting the aid from the EU with all of the onerous conditions (which more or less guarantee recession/depression in Ireland for years, as in Greece). And then the EU will have to decide whether it wants to slacken the conditions, or let Ireland fail.

Irish bonds dipped a tiny bit (5bps) in a generally rallying market, but it is hard to read very much into the behavior of that market when the ECB stands ready to scoop up lots of bonds when needed. Credit default swaps on Ireland widened 10bps while those for other periphery countries narrowed 5-10bps on the day (thanks to my friend AK for the update!). But in general, this is still a page 5 story, at best, here. If and when the budget fails (which it shouldn’t), or if and when the new government repudiates the EU deal (which I think is somewhat likely) after the February elections, it will become a page 1 story again. And it won’t just be a story about Ireland at that point, but also the other periphery nations and indeed the whole bailout structure, because as much as Europe wants to think of itself as one body, it still has a couple of dozen legislatures. Getting unanimity from a loose confederation of states is a daunting challenge, and retaining unanimity will be a great feat indeed. But for now, still page 5 and the dollar keeps sinking against the Euro.

The Treasury market was near unchanged, and the inflation market mixed. Stocks rallied back to Friday’s high (still 5 points shy of a new rally high) on very light volume of less than 1bln shares. Equity volumes so far this year, in fact, have remained slack despite the widespread opinion that a new bull market is underway. Perhaps some of that may be due to the weather, but as the chart below shows (click to enlarge) the volumes for the first 15 trading days of 2011 are the slowest of the last half-dozen years.

Equity volumes have been more consistent with bear-market than bull-market sums so far in 2011.

Exploit Elevated Volatility With This S&P 500 Option Trade

The problems stemming from the Eurozone continue to hang ominously over the global stock market.

While October saw a groundswell of buying that bolstered equity prices and returned us to more of a normal trending state, Wednesday�s market sell-off was a painful reminder that we�re not out of the woods yet.

Not surprisingly, the bloodbath was accompanied by a notable surge in panic as demand for option protection soared. The CBOE Volatility Index (CBOE:VIX) rose an impressive 31.5%, vaulting from 27 to 36. The last two times the VIX reached these heights, the advance was rebuffed — signaling a golden opportunity to enter short volatility plays. Such an opportunity may be in the cards yet again.

The common play of choice for traders looking to exploit elevated option premiums is the iron condor. Though it is a four-legged position and perhaps a bit intimidating at first glance, it�s actually a fairly straightforward strategy.

Think of it as exactly what it is: two spread trades on the same underlying asset. Best of all, both of them pay you right away!

An iron condor involves simultaneously entering an out-of-the-money bull-put spread and an out-of-the-money bear-call spread. The strategy is designed to profit as long as the market remains between the short strikes of either spread.

With implied volatility as high as it is, the options market is pricing in huge movement over the coming month. By entering an iron condor, we�re expressing our opinion that the market will NOT move as much as is currently priced in.

With the SPDR S&P 500 ETF (NYSE:SPY) currently trading at $124, we could enter an iron condor by selling the following two spreads:

1. December Bear-Call Spread: Sell to open the SPY Dec 133 Call for $0.70 while buying to open the SPY Dec 138 Call for $0.14. The net credit received on this part of the trade is $0.56.

2. December Bull-Put Spread: Sell to open the SPY Dec 110 Put for $1.47 while buying to open the SPY Dec 105 Put for $0.97. The net credit received on this part of the trade is $0.50.

The total credit received for the iron condor is $1.06 ($0.56 + $0.50), which represents the maximum potential reward. The max risk is the width of the spread ($138 strike – $133 strike, or $110 strike – $105 strike = $5) minus the net credit ($5 – $1.06 = $3.94).

Provided the SPY remains between $133 and $110 by December expiration, the iron condor will come out a winner. This means the SPY would have to rise more than 9% or fall more than 11% in about five weeks for the trade to be a loser at expiration.


Source: MachTrader

At the time of this writing Tyler Craig had no positions in SPY.

Why Oil is so Vulnerable to Price Spikes


Gas prices have already started an upward trend this year, approaching the $6-level in some areas.

Oil is up again for the 7th day in-a-row!

While some fear that oil production is in the midst of a supply crisis, demand continues to rise so trading prices are rising too.

But that's not the primary reason for the surge in gas prices...

President Barack Obama addressed the situation during a speech at the University of Miami.

The climate in the Middle East is making this worse, he said. Iran is upset about sanctions on its nuclear program, and unrest elsewhere is hurting production.

Obama stressed his energy plan as a solution, although that plan won't have immediate results.

For now, oil companies have the upper-hand and those companies' shareholders will continue to gain. Meanwhile, consumers will simply have to suck-it-up and dish out a little extra dough at the pump.

In what the President is calling his “all-of-the-above” solution, he recommends a continued increase in domestic production to break away from imports as much as possible, an increase in alternative energy, and an increase in fuel efficiency in vehicles.

Michael Levi of the Council on Foreign Relations stressed the importance of numerous long-term solutions:

“There is no silver bullet that deals with the energy challenges we face.”

Domestic solutions are one small step in the right direction, but it's no simple task, especially when outside forces have control over the oil prices.

Bloomberg’s “Off the Charts” video details the price spike:

“When oil production is far from the absolute maximum, the price stays in a very narrow range.  But when the production picks up, oil prices become erratic.”

 

Saturday, September 29, 2012

ManTech International Passes This Key Test

There's no foolproof way to know the future for ManTech International (Nasdaq: MANT  ) or any other company. However, certain clues may help you see potential stumbles before they happen -- and before your stock craters as a result.

A cloudy crystal ball
In this series, we use accounts receivable and days sales outstanding to judge a company's current health and future prospects. It's an important step in separating the pretenders from the market's best stocks. Alone, AR -- the amount of money owed the company -- and DSO -- the number of days' worth of sales owed to the company -- don't tell you much. However, by considering the trends in AR and DSO, you can sometimes get a window onto the future.

Sometimes, problems with AR or DSO simply indicate a change in the business (like an acquisition), or lax collections. However, AR that grows more quickly than revenue, or ballooning DSO, can also suggest a desperate company that's trying to boost sales by giving its customers overly generous payment terms. Alternately, it can indicate that the company sprinted to book a load of sales at the end of the quarter, like used-car dealers on the 29th of the month. (Sometimes, companies do both.)

Why might an upstanding firm like ManTech International do this? For the same reason any other company might: to make the numbers. Investors don't like revenue shortfalls, and employees don't like reporting them to their superiors.

Is ManTech International sending any potential warning signs? Take a look at the chart below, which plots revenue growth against AR growth, and DSO:

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Data is current as of last fully reported fiscal quarter. FQ = fiscal quarter.

The standard way to calculate DSO uses average accounts receivable. I prefer to look at end-of-quarter receivables, but I've plotted both above.

Watching the trends
When that red line (AR growth) crosses above the green line (revenue growth), I know I need to consult the filings. Similarly, a spike in the blue bars indicates a trend worth worrying about. ManTech International's latest average DSO stands at 67.8 days, and the end-of-quarter figure is 67.8 days. Differences in business models can generate variations in DSO, and business needs can require occasional fluctuations, but all things being equal, I like to see this figure stay steady. So, let's get back to our original question: Based on DSO and sales, does ManTech International look like it might miss it numbers in the next quarter or two?

I don't think so. AR and DSO look healthy. For the last fully reported fiscal quarter, ManTech International's year-over-year revenue grew 11.8%, and its AR grew 7.5%. That looks OK. End-of-quarter DSO decreased 3.9% from the prior-year quarter. It was up 3.4% versus the prior quarter. Still, I'm no fortuneteller, and these are just numbers. Investors putting their money on the line always need to dig into the filings for the root causes and draw their own conclusions.

What now?
I use this kind of analysis to figure out which investments I need to watch more closely as I hunt the market's best returns. However, some investors actively seek out companies on the wrong side of AR trends in order to sell them short, profiting when they eventually fall. Which way would you play this one? Let us know in the comments below, or keep up with the stocks mentioned in this article by tracking them in our free watchlist service, My Watchlist.

  • Add ManTech International to My Watchlist.

Latin America Investment Leads the Way

The latest HSBC survey confirms recent Bloomberg findings and put investment in Brazil at the top of global rankings. Between them, Latin America and Brazil are world investment hotspots.

According to those polled by HSBC Holdings plc last week, Latin America represents the best prospects for growth in investment over the next six months. In the survey, 30% of businesses ranked Latin America in top position for investment opportunities in the next semester. Latin America came ahead of China (25%) and Canada (15%), two other major trading regions for importers and exporters.

Latin America is favoured for its high economic growth – the region is set to grow 4.8% this year. Leading the Latin American boom are Brazil and Peru with Colombia and Chile also experiencing strong economic growth, which emphasises the area’s potential as a whole.

Of all the Latin American nations, Chile and Brazil represent the best bets for investment. Brazil is enjoying strong growth, record employment figures and the prospect of becoming the 5th largest economic power in the world within the next decade. Contrast this with many developed countries, currently facing high unemployment, burgeoning deficits and fears of a double-dip recession.

The HSBC survey also highlights the changing dynamics in world economics as emerging markets dominate the top-performing positions. Not only have emerging markets generally experienced a short recession, they are also leading the rest of the world to economic recovery.

With emerging markets set to represent almost half the global economy over the next few years, many multinationals are convinced that investment in these markets makes real business sense. Large companies are moving into emerging markets as part of their global strategy. And Brazilian investments tops the list for many – in the HSBC survey, 74% of companies said they currently trade with Brazil and a similar figure (76%) does business with China.

A particularly strong sector in Brazil is private equity with two-thirds of private equity deals in Latin America taking place here. The latest arrival is Blackstone, who now has a 40% share in the Brazilian P�tria. For the company, the creation of the Brazilian middle classes “has got very substantial momentum” and as a result, presence in Brazil is a must. Other private equity firms such as Carlyle Group and Warburg Pincus have also expressed strong interest in Brazil, proving P�tria’s point that “the competition is coming to Brazil”.

For Obelisk International, the Bloomberg and HSBC surveys underline the investment potential in Brazil. As more businesses come to appreciate this potential, more surveys will highlight the fact that Brazil is the place to be when it comes to investment. Over the next six months, Obelisk International expects to be joined by many more companies in Brazil.

About Obelisk International
Obelisk International is a private investment business specializing in Brazilian investments. Obelisk offers private investors the opportunity to invest into Obelisk businesses through projects sourced exclusively in Brazil.

Contact Obelisk International on 0034 952 820 319. Via email: info@obeliskinternational.com or visit our website: http://www.obeliskinternational.com.

Sinking Ships: MA vs. RI Unemployment Spread, November 2009

As I had noted in my original post, historically it has been very unusual for there to be more than a 1.5% difference (either more or less) between the unemployment rates in Massachusetts and Rhode Island.

Recently though, we have seen a historically unusual spread between Rhode Island’s high rate and Massachusetts’ far lower rate.

In fact, the latest 3.9% spread nearly exceeds all spreads seen in at least 40 years.

This indicates that either Rhode Island’s current rate would need to fall dramatically or the Massachusetts rate would need to increase sharply. My sense, especially in light of the financial turmoil seen since September 2008, is that Mass will be continually playing catch-up.

The latest regional unemployment report shows that, in November, the Rhode Island unemployment rate declined to 12.7% while the Massachusetts rate declined slightly to 8.8%.

Massachusetts is still experiencing large year-over-year increases to unemployment jumping 44.26% on a year-over-year basis continuing to indicate that Mass is slogging through a period of serious job weakness.

click to enlarge

RIMM Likely to Trade Below Book For Some Time, Says Cowen

Analysts continue to publish their expectations as Research In Motion (RIMM) gets set to announce fiscal Q3 results later this afternoon, after the bell, and the piling on continues.

Cowen & Co.’s Matthew Hoffman, who has an Underperform rating on the shares, this morning writes that there is “no sign of a bottom” to the breakdown of the company’s financial performance since RIM’s negative pre-announcement on December 2nd.

Hoffman thinks the shares will trail the market by 20% the next 12 months as they continue to fetch a “substantial discount to book value” based on several challenges, not all of which are even reflected yet in the stock, he thinks.� Book value was $18.92 in Q2 but tangible book was more like $14.52, he writes.

Those challenges include the transition of the BlackBerry to the BB OS 10 version; maintaining the commitment to the PlayBook tablet computer; the rise in working capital needs as a result of a build-up in inventories; and challenges to RIM’s email service.

As for tonight’s results, Hoffman sees the company producing $5.23 billion last quarter and $1.20 per share in profit, and cut his fiscal Q4 estimate to $4.64 billion in revenue and $1 per share, down from $5.28 billion and $1.10.

Previously: RIM: BGC Cuts Target To $13 On �Declining Trajectory�, December 14th, 2011.

Renren Deep in the Red

Despite massive growth, China's very own "Facebook," Renren (NYSE: RENN  ) , came out with third-quarter revenue figures below analyst expectations. Let's take a closer, Foolish look to see why this happened.

Show me the money
Renren saw its total revenues jump by 57.1% to $34.2 million from the previous year's quarter. The company's online advertising revenues shot up by 91.8% to $19.6 million due to the expansion of its user base and ramp-up in user activity, with an increase in the number of active users from 103 million to 137 million from the year-ago quarter.

Revenues from the company's Internet VAS, or value-added services, saw a 26.3% increase to $14.6 million, mainly due to a 23.6% increase in its online gaming revenues and a 35.2% increase in other value-added offerings, which include Nuomi.com, a social commerce website.

Renren's heavier losses can be attributed to a number of relatively higher expenses that eroded top-line growth. First of all, the company's cost of revenue shot up by 62.3% to $6.7 million. In addition, the operating expenditure skyrocketed by 145.9% to $34 million.

Operating expenses included high advertising campaign expenses for Nuomi along with higher promotional expenditure for the launch of new online games such as Plants vs. Zombies. Elevated spending on R&D also played its part due to an increase in the number of employees.

So despite the impressive rise in revenues, the company's earnings actually fell into the red with a net loss of $1.2 million against a profit of $7.3 million in the year-ago quarter.

While Nuomi is the main cause of Renren's current financial woes, even if you exclude Nuomi's operational results, Renren's third-quarter net profit figure would still show a decline by 14% to $6.2 million. This is because of the higher promotional expenses for online games coupled with higher compensations for personnel and increased commissions for advertising sales.

On the other hand, a look at peer Baidu.com (Nasdaq: BIDU  ) shows a different story, one of soaring revenues and profits along with a strong revenue guidance for the coming quarter, which is expected to exceed expectations. But steeper losses aren't the only problem facing Renren.

China cracks the whip
China has promised to up the ante in terms of monitoring and controlling online messaging and social networking sites like Renren. The law would strictly punish the publication of supposedly "harmful information" that goes against the government. This also applies to peer SINA (Nasdaq: SINA  ) , which runs Weibo, a microblogging service, and Tencent Holdings, which runs QQ, an instant-messaging service.

Getting more social
Setting all this aside, Renren recently announced the $80 million acquisition of 56.com, a leading video content website in China that features user-generated content, similar to Google's (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) YouTube. Sites like 56.com have been increasingly popular among social-networking site users. Thus, the acquisition, which is expected to close in the fourth quarter, would further help Renren's users upload and share their personal videos.

The Foolish bottom line
Renren is still in start-up mode, so investors may cut it some slack as long as it's showing fast revenue growth, as it has for the past three quarters sequentially. Ultimately, as it scales up, the company will have to show that it can make, as well as spend, money.

So, what do you Fools think about Renren's performance? Leave your comments in the box below. You can also stay up to speed with Renren by adding it to your very own�watchlist. It's free, and it keeps you up to date on the latest news and analysis for your favorite companies.

Underestimated Stocks: Hedge Funds Missed Out on These 9 Winning Streaks

Analyzing the buying trends of "big money" investors like hedge funds becomes especially interesting when compared with price performance. Have hedge funds been making winning positions? If not, it opens up the question of whether hedge funds have been wrong, or whether they know something the market hasn't yet realized.

Winning streaks are one interesting angle to consider price performance.

Stocks with a persistence of days in which they recently outperformed the S&P 500 and little persistence in recently underperforming the S&P 500 benchmark are very likely surrounded by positive market sentiment.

The screen
To use these concepts, we ran a screen on recently "winning" stocks: those that have seen a persistence of days in which the stock beat the S&P 500 benchmark over the last month and little persistence in underperforming the S&P 500, i.e. long winning streaks and short losing streaks, as measured by a ratio of the longest winning streak to the longest losing streak.

We screened these winners for those seeing the opposite sentiment (bearishness) from institutional investors like hedge funds, with significant net institutional selling over the current quarter.

Clearly hedge funds disagree with the broader market -- do you think hedge funds are wrong, or do they know something the market hasn't yet priced in?

Use this list as a starting point for your own analysis.

List sorted alphabetically. (Click here to access free, interactive tools to analyze these ideas.)

List compiled by Eben Esterhuizen, CFA:

1. AMERIGROUP (NYSE: AGP  ) : Operates as a multi-state managed health care company. Net institutional sales in the current quarter at 3.1M shares, which represents about 6.65% of the company's float of 46.65M shares. The stock's average daily alpha vs. the S&P 500 index stands at 1.47% (measured close to close, over the last month). During this period, the longest winning streak lasted 4 days (i.e., the stock's daily returns outperformed the S&P 500 for 4 consecutive days). The longest losing streak lasted 1 day (i.e., a win streak / losing streak ratio of 4.).

2. American Reprographics (NYSE: ARC  ) : Provides business-to-business document management services. Net institutional sales in the current quarter at 2.0M shares, which represents about 6.24% of the company's float of 32.05M shares. The stock's average daily alpha vs. the S&P 500 index stands at 0.76% (measured close to close, over the last month). During this period, the longest winning streak lasted 5 days (i.e., the stock's daily returns outperformed the S&P 500 for 5 consecutive days). The longest losing streak lasted 2 days (i.e., a win streak / losing streak ratio of 2.5).

3. CoreLogic (Nasdaq: CLGX  ) : Provides property, financial, and consumer information, analytics, and services to mortgage originators and servicers, financial institutions, government and government-sponsored enterprises, and other businesses in the United States. Net institutional sales in the current quarter at 11.7M shares, which represents about 12.28% of the company's float of 95.24M shares. The stock's average daily alpha vs. the S&P 500 index stands at 0.88% (measured close to close, over the last month). During this period, the longest winning streak lasted 6 days (i.e., the stock's daily returns outperformed the S&P 500 for 6 consecutive days). The longest losing streak lasted 2 days (i.e., a win streak / losing streak ratio of 3.).

4. FEI (Nasdaq: FEIC  ) : Supplies instruments for nanoscale imaging, analysis, and prototyping that enable research, development, and manufacturing in industrial, academic, and research institutional applications. Net institutional sales in the current quarter at 1.4M shares, which represents about 4% of the company's float of 34.98M shares. The stock's average daily alpha vs. the S&P 500 index stands at 0.96% (measured close to close, over the last month). During this period, the longest winning streak lasted 6 days (i.e., the stock's daily returns outperformed the S&P 500 for 6 consecutive days). The longest losing streak lasted 2 days (i.e., a win streak / losing streak ratio of 3.).

5. Furiex Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: FURX  ) : Engages in the compound partnering business in the United States and Europe. Net institutional sales in the current quarter at 345.1K shares, which represents about 4.87% of the company's float of 7.09M shares. The stock's average daily alpha vs. the S&P 500 index stands at 1.06% (measured close to close, over the last month). During this period, the longest winning streak lasted 5 days (i.e., the stock's daily returns outperformed the S&P 500 for 5 consecutive days). The longest losing streak lasted 2 days (i.e., a win streak / losing streak ratio of 2.5).

6. Stream Global Services (NYSE: SGS  ) : Operates as a global business process outsourcing service provider. Net institutional sales in the current quarter at 35.8M shares, which represents about 61.58% of the company's float of 58.14M shares. The stock's average daily alpha vs. the S&P 500 index stands at 1.7% (measured close to close, over the last month). During this period, the longest winning streak lasted 7 days (i.e., the stock's daily returns outperformed the S&P 500 for 7 consecutive days). The longest losing streak lasted 2 days (i.e., a win streak / losing streak ratio of 3.5).

7. Spreadtrum Communications (Nasdaq: SPRD  ) : Operates as a fabless semiconductor company that designs, develops, and markets baseband processor and RF transceiver solutions for wireless communications and mobile television markets. Net institutional sales in the current quarter at 6.0M shares, which represents about 17.75% of the company's float of 33.80M shares. The stock's average daily alpha vs. the S&P 500 index stands at 1.3% (measured close to close, over the last month). During this period, the longest winning streak lasted 7 days (i.e., the stock's daily returns outperformed the S&P 500 for 7 consecutive days). The longest losing streak lasted 2 days (i.e., a win streak / losing streak ratio of 3.5).

Interactive Chart: Press Play to compare changes in analyst ratings over the last two years for the stocks mentioned above. Analyst ratings sourced from Zacks Investment Research.

Your browser does not support iframes.


Kapitall's Eben Esterhuizen and Rebecca Lipman do not own any of the shares mentioned above. Data from 11/14. Institutional data sourced from Fidelity, price data sourced from Yahoo! Finance.

If You Own Them, Sell These 5 CEFs As Soon As Possible

Once a week I research closed-end funds to hold, sell, or buy. In this article I highlight five closed end funds which investors should sell immediately. The evidence is rock-solid and the CEFs are on rocky ground, poised for a significant nose dive.

Cornerstone Total Return (CRF)
CRF has provided investors a 5-year total annualized rate-of-return of (-11.9%). The fund's performance provides adequate guidance to sell CRF and search for a better alternative. The S&P 500 index has provided a .3% total annualized rate-of-return over the same period.

CRF is presently trading at a 55% premium to net-asset-value (NAV). Cornerstone operates closed end funds which earn profits by charging a percentage of assets under management. The annual expense ratio is excessive at 2.36%. The higher the assets under management (AUM), the higher the operator's profits. Cornerstone could file a CRF secondary on any given day, and this CEF would plummet in value. Traders could simply short sell CRF and buy the CRF-secondary shares near their true NAV.

CRF's SEC N-2 Filing, dated March 31st, 2011, indicates a very ordinary portfolio structure. The N-2 provides insight into CRF's ownership of blue chip stocks, and closed end funds. All assets are Level 1, explicitly stating CRF does not have any positions which are potentially mispriced to substantiate the 55% premium to NAV.

click on all charts to enlarge



Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT)
The Gabelli Utility Trust (GUT) is the second CEF to sell immediately. There are zero positive reasons to own this fund. Gabelli's quick fund fact sheet, dated December 31st, 2010, highlights the rationale to sell this CEF today. The fund is a plain vanilla utility trust that was selling at a 19.1% premium on December 31st. To be clear, this means investors were paying 19.1% more than fair value.

Investing goals are to buy assets at a discount to their value. The investor is doomed to fail if they pay more than fair value to start their investment decision process.

The March 31st, 2011, SEC N-2 filing indicates ordinary utility and energy equities. The fund has close to 100% Level 1 assets, although there is one Level 3 position which appears to lack any value.

The fund has the following negative attributes:

  • 21.88% effective leverage,
  • high 1.91% annual expense ratio,
  • 25.04% premium to net asset value

Investors should sell any closed end fund which is trading at a 25.04% premium to the actual value.


DNP Select Income (DNP)
If an investor owns DNP Select Income (DNP), they will do themselves a favor by selling the fund as soon as possible. The fund's history did show a 4.5% annualized total rate-of-return compared to an S&P 500 .3% annualized total rate of return over the same time frame. The time frame is from January 31st, 2007 through July 22nd, 2011.

The DNP SEC N-Q, dated March 31st, 2011, shows the current holdings which do not indicate any holdings worth noting, nor any significant variance from standard closed end funds.

DNP contains the following negative CEF attributes, which collectively signal to the average investor to "sell immediately":

  • a high annual expense ratio, 2.19%, with assets under management approaching $3-billion,
  • effective leverage of an extremely high 34.14%,
  • an excessive 23.92% premium to net asset value

Investors are not well served buying or holding a fund with such a high leverage rate and selling at a near 25% premium to NAV. Investors can find a great number of better substitutes in which to invest their money.



Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV)
Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) is one of the few ways to own physical silver in an equity format. There are alternatives, however, to provide a better substitute to PSLV. The fund displays basic fund attributes that make this equity indefensible to own. Sprott Asset Management, as of March 31st, 2011, held 15,224,615-PSLV shares.

Sprott's SEC 20-F filing shows the fund lacks anything worthy of a 22% premium to NAV. The Sprott website shows the simplicity of the holdings. Sprott holds silver in a bank vault and the silver is audited. Metal investors are conscience of their metal's value and know there isn't any reason to pay 122% of silver bullion's value so the silver can be stored by a 3rd party.

The Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) began trading on October 29th, 2010, and has had an excellent run as silver bullion has broken out on the upside during this time. There is a difference in owning silver bullion at fair market value versus market value plus 22%. Owners of PSLV should sell their holdings immediately. Sprott will issue a secondary offering and the current PSLV shares will drop closer to their NAV. The present scenario is a supply versus demand issue.



PIMCO Strategic Global Govt (RCS)
PIMCO Strategic Global (RCS) should be sold without hesitation. PIMCO is a premier and preeminent fixed income shop. This fund, however, lacks credibility as an interesting investment.

PIMCO Strategic Global contains the following negative attributes:

  • 53.18% effective leverage,
  • a 15.35% premium to net asset value

The fund has outperformed the S&P 500 over the past 5 years. RCS has achieved an 8.7% annualized total rate-of-return compared to an S&P 500 .3% annualized total rate-of-return over the same timeframe.

The fund has $840-million assets under management. The annual expense ratio is reasonable with 1.42% fee. The fund's premium to net asset value explicitly is a warning sign and should be reason to liquidate RCS ownership.

The SEC N-2, as of April 30th, 2011, lists the stock equities and the Government Sponsored Entity (GSE) holdings. The fund's premium is a barrier to ownership consideration. Investors are well advised to liquidate their fund holdings. An investor paying a 15% premium to NAV is immediately put in a difficult position upon purchase. Sell RCS and buy a fund at a discount to NAV.



Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

Roth IRAs: Put Your Teen on the Retirement Fast-Track

IRAs for teens? No, I haven’t lost my mind.

I remember when I first mentioned opening an IRA for my then-teenaged son. Both he and my wife looked at me like I’d just announced we were moving to Pluto. But they aren’t looking askance any longer.

By matching my son’s summer earnings and putting the money away in a Roth IRA, the 24-year-old has already built up a tidy sum that, despite last year’s drubbing, will continue to grow for many years to come. And, he’s learned the value of early and long-term investing and compounding.

Roth IRAs vs. Traditional IRAs

The Roth IRA is an excellent retirement savings vehicle for younger people. Since their introduction in 1998, Roth IRAs have been garnering respect (and dollars) from knowledgeable investors for the advantages they have over traditional IRAs.

While a traditional IRA allows you to deduct your contributions pre-tax, it also locks your money in until you are 59� years old (unless you feel like paying a 10% fee on withdrawals, plus federal taxes), and forces you to take distributions upon reaching the age of 70�, paying federal taxes at your future — and possibly higher — tax rate.

In contrast, when contributing to a Roth IRA, you invest with after-tax dollars now and can withdraw funds tax-free after the age of 59� or if you meet other IRS qualifications (for instance, if the distributions will be used for a first-time home purchase or to help with a disability).

Once you do hit retirement, there is no requirement on distributions — if you don’t feel like taking money out, you can leave it in there to continue growing.

So why are these great starter investments for teenagers or young adults?

The Power of Compounding

Simple: Taxes and the power of compounding. If your child is only working for the summer, or just starting their professional career, they will likely be in one of the lowest tax brackets, making it a fantastic deal to pay taxes on their retirement savings now as opposed to when they are older and in a higher bracket.

The power of compounding — i.e., the act of generating earnings from previous earnings — is what makes any kind of tax-deferred investment a superb bargain.

Let’s take a look at an example…

Let’s say you make a $100 investment in a fund that rises 20% in a year. After that year, you’d have $120. Instead of selling your shares, you let them ride, and the fund gains another 20% the next year, bringing your investment value up to $144. That’s an additional $4 in gains over the first year (or 4% on the original $100 investment) generated because you gained 20% not only on your original investment but also 20% on all the gains earned in the first year.

While this may not seem like an impressive amount, with each passing year, that earnings potential grows even higher, so long as the investment prospers. If you start actively investing a set amount each year, adding to the amount generated by what the investment earns on its own, you create even larger potential earnings. Take a look at the table below to see what I mean.

An Example of Compounding in Action

I set up several different scenarios for the purpose of this table. All of them assume an 8% annual return, with the difference in scenarios being the amount contributed per year, increasing in $1,000 increments from $1,000 to $5,000 (the maximum currently allowed under IRS rules for investors age 49 and younger for 2008), from the age of 15 to 70. Yes, I realize that 2008 was a disaster, but remember that the long-run average for stocks is closer to 10%, and we certainly aren’t done yet.

Finally, the last scenario attempts to show a conservative, natural progression a young person might follow as they age and gain employment — starting with their first summer job at age 15, they invest $1,000 a year until they graduate from college and get settled into a career, bumping their contribution up to $2,000 a year by 23. By age 30, they will (hopefully) be well-established and able to again bump their contribution up to $4,000, and at 40 a bump again to $5,000, an amount they continue to contribute up until retirement.



























































Roth IRAs Age Well
Age$1,000

a Year
$2,000

a Year
$3,000

a Year
$4,000

a Year
$5,000

a Year
Gradual Increase
15 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $1,000
30 $29,324 $58,649 $87,973 $117,297 $146,621 $42,972
60 $417,426 $834,852 $1,252,278 $1,669,704 $2,087,130 $976,251
70 $916,837 $1,833,674 $2,750,511 $3,667,348 $4,584,185 $2,185,880
Assumes an 8% annual rate of return

You can see that the greater the contribution and the greater the time that’s passed, the larger and faster the account grows. That is the power of compounding — by constantly adding to your investment, you increase the potential return, going from what seems like a paltry $1,000 initial investment at age 15 to almost $420,000 by age 60, simply by adding $1,000 a year to the account and achieving an 8% annual return. With larger initial (and subsequent) investments, you get even more bang for your buck.

So the next question is: How can we get a teenager to save for retirement?

How to Get Started Saving for Retirement

I hope I’ve both made the benefits of funding an IRA clear, and simplified it enough that you can show this to your teens.

But the question remains: How can we get a teenager to save for retirement?

My advice: Help them.

Let’s assume you can afford to match their summer earnings. Do it. Let them have their hard-earned money, but open a Roth IRA in your child or grandchild’s name and add the money yourself. Remember, the child may earn $1,000 but with taxes will not bring it all home. That doesn’t keep you from putting a full $1,000 into a Roth for them.

Maybe you can’t afford to add the full amount. Consider making a deal with your teen to match a portion of their earnings that they add to the Roth as well. If the teen contributes $250, maybe you’ll contribute $500. Grandparents, obviously, can also get into this act.

Remember, the longer you or your children wait, the smaller your potential compounded earnings. Of course, with income comes taxes, and your children will need to begin filing their own tax returns.

And, as I mentioned earlier, contributions to a Roth IRA are not made pre-tax, as they would be on a traditional IRA. Also be aware that if you do help your child by contributing on their behalf, the total amount put into the IRA cannot exceed their total earnings in any given tax year. (This will be more of a concern for the youngest investors.)

In any case, helping to put your teenage child or grandchild on the road to a more comfortable retirement may truly be one of the best gifts you can make, and it will be one that keeps on giving, year after year. It may be years, but eventually your children will thank you for your foresight.

For over 18 years, independent Vanguard “watchdog” Dan Wiener has been telling subscribers to his Independent Adviser for Vanguard Investors which underperforming, poorly run, undiversified or tax-inefficient funds to avoid AND giving them the best Vanguard investments for their money. In fact, his recommendations earn a 94% advantage over the typical Vanguard investor! Don’t miss the chance to gain this competitive advantage for your portfolio.

Is John Wiley & Sons Making You Fast Cash?

It takes money to make money. Most investors know that, but with business media so focused on the "how much," very few investors bother to ask, "How fast?"

When judging a company's prospects, how quickly it turns cash outflows into cash inflows can be just as important as how much profit it's booking in the accounting fantasy world we call "earnings." This is one of the first metrics I check when I'm hunting for the market's best stocks. Today, we'll see how it applies to John Wiley & Sons (NYSE: JW-A  ) .

Let's break this down
In this series, we measure how swiftly a company turns cash into goods or services and back into cash. We'll use a quick, relatively foolproof tool known as the cash conversion cycle, or CCC for short.

Why does the CCC matter? The less time it takes a firm to convert outgoing cash into incoming cash, the more powerful and flexible its profit engine is. The less money tied up in inventory and accounts receivable, the more available to grow the company, pay investors, or both.

To calculate the cash conversion cycle, add days inventory outstanding to days sales outstanding, then subtract days payable outstanding. Like golf, the lower your score here, the better.

Here's the CCC for John Wiley & Sons, alongside the comparable figures from a few competitors and peers.

Company

TTM Revenue

TTM CCC

�John Wiley & Sons $1,770 �(9)
�R.R. Donnelley & Sons $10,597 �49
�Courier Corporation $259 �98
�Pearson $9,214 �(42)

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. Data is current as of last fully reported fiscal quarter. TTM = trailing 12 months.

For younger, fast-growth companies, the CCC can give you valuable insight into the sustainability of that growth. A company that's taking longer to make cash may need to tap financing to keep its momentum. For older, mature companies, the CCC can tell you how well the company is managed. Firms that begin to lose control of the CCC may be losing their clout with their suppliers (who might be demanding stricter payment terms) and customers (who might be demanding more generous terms). This can sometimes be an important signal of future distress -- one most investors are likely to miss.

While I find peer comparisons useful, I'm most interested in comparing a company's CCC to its prior performance. Here's where I believe all investors need to become trend-watchers. Sure, there may be legitimate reasons for an increase in the CCC, but all things being equal, I want to see this number stay steady or move downward over time.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FY = fiscal year. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Because of the seasonality in some businesses, the CCC for the TTM period may not be strictly comparable to the fiscal-year periods shown in the chart. Even the steadiest-looking businesses on an annual basis will experience some quarterly fluctuations in the CCC. To get an understanding of the usual ebb and flow at John Wiley & Sons, consult the quarterly period chart below.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FQ = fiscal quarter.

Based only on the raw number, John Wiley & Sons has achieved the enviable feat of running a negative CCC cycle. That is, it typically collects what is owed it before it pays what it owes to others. On a 12-month basis, the trend at John Wiley & Sons looks very good. At -9.1 days, it is 41.6 days better than the five-year average of 32.4 days. The biggest contributor to that improvement was DPO, which improved 31.6 days compared to the five-year average. That was partially offset by a 0.9-day increase in DSO.

Considering the numbers on a quarterly basis, the CCC trend at John Wiley & Sons looks weak. At 3.4 days, it is 3.6 days worse than the average of the past eight quarters. Investors will want to keep an eye on this for the future to make sure it doesn't stray too far in the wrong direction. With quarterly CCC doing worse than average and the latest 12-month CCC coming in better, John Wiley & Sons gets a mixed review in this cash-conversion checkup.

Though the CCC can take a little work to calculate, it's definitely worth watching every quarter. You'll be better informed about potential problems, and you'll improve your odds of finding the underappreciated home run stocks that provide the market's best returns.

To stay on top of the CCC for your favorite companies, just use the handy links below to add companies to your free watchlist.

  • Add John Wiley & Sons to My Watchlist.
  • Add R.R. Donnelley & Sons to My Watchlist.
  • Add Courier to My Watchlist.
  • Add Pearson to My Watchlist.

Afternoon Movers: Wolverine Given the Boot, Black & Decker Higher

Shares of boot maker Wolverine World Wide (WWW) are being given the boot, falling $1.76, or 6.5%, to $25.39 after the company this morning missed Q4 revenue and profit estimates and forecast this year’s profit below estimates. Q4 sales fell almost 10% to $312.5 million, missing the average $318.5 million estimate, while profit per share of 45 cents was merely in line. This year, the company sees profit per share of $1.88 to $1.96, below the $1.98 average estimate, and sales of $1.14 billion to $1.17 billion versus the average $1.15 billion estimate.

Tool maker Black & Decker (BDK) is higher by $2.52, or 3.7%, at $71.27 after the company this morning reported a blow-out Q4, with profit per share of $1.24 coming in a full 47 cents higher than expected, excluding the costs of the company’s acquisition of Stanley Works. Revenue fell 5.6% to $1.3 billion, $100 million better than expected. For this quarter, B&D forecast revenue growth in the single digits in revenue, which is better than the consensus forecast for a 1% decline.

Electrical controls maker Powell Industries (POWL) is up $1, or 3.4%, at $30.35 after the company blew away fiscal Q1 EPS estimates this morning with 83 cents, versus 59 cents per share expected, even though it missed revenue by a wide margin, at $139.5 million versus $155.5 million expected. The company forecast year sales and profit in line with expectations, with revenue forecast at $550 million to $600 million versus the average $584 million estimate and PES of $1.65 to $2 versus the $1.82 average estimate.

Construction materials maker Headwaters (HW) is off 23 cents, or 4%, at $5.28 afterthe firm this morning substantially missed fiscal Q1 sales and profit estimates, turning in revenue of $139.6 million and profit per share of 23 cents, versus the expected $153.5 million and 31 cents. Nevertheless, management declared the quarter the most favorable year-over-year change in two years.

$20 billion (market cap) scientific equipment giant Thermo Fisher Scientific (TMO) is up 78 cents, or 1.6%, at $48.36 this afternoon after the company this morning reported Q4 revenue rose 7.3% to $2.84 billion, beating the average estimate by $100 million, yielding profit per share of 91 cents, three cents better than expected. For this year, the company forecast profit in line and revenue ahead of expectations, at $3.30 to $3.45 per share in profit, against expectations for $3.38, and $10.6 billion to $10.8 billion in revenue versus the average $10.6 billion consensus.

Friday, September 28, 2012

This Lender Deserves a Second Look

The country's sixth-largest lender, PNC Financial (NYSE: PNC  ) , saw its first-quarter profits fall by 2.5% mainly because of acquisition-related costs. Despite the fall in profits, PNC's share price went up as results came in ahead of analyst expectations.

Acquiring gains
PNC earned $1.44 a share for the quarter, lower than the $1.57 per share it earned a year ago. However, let's not forget that this includes a $0.18-per-share charge related to its acquisition of the U.S. retail banking operations of Royal Bank of Canada (NYSE: RY  ) . PNC acquired RBC Bank (USA) last month for $3.45 billion. In the deal, PNC obtained $18 billion in deposits and also $15 billion in loans, considerably expanding its footprint. This quarter's earnings took a hit as the integration of RBC Bank into PNC cost a substantial $145 million.

Helped by loans added in the acquisition, PNC's net interest income rose 4% to $2.3 billion. The bank's noninterest income grew by 7% to $1.4 billion, helped by an increase in residential mortgage and asset management revenue. The acquisition also helped the bank grow its top line by 8%.

All-time low interest rates have been pressuring banks, but PNC seems to have countered this by growing its loans. The bank's loans grew by $17 billion to $176 billion this quarter, with the RBC (USA) purchase contributing $15 billion. This should come as positive news for banks, given prevailing rock-bottom interest rates.

Peer US Bancorp (NYSE: USB  ) , which posted results earlier this week, also saw its loan books grow. Average total loans at the bank grew by 6.4%, helped by a healthy 17% increase in commercial borrowing. USB's net interest income rose by 7.3% which, coupled with lower credit losses, helped the bank's bottom line increase by 28%.

Improved quality
Helped by an overall improvement in credit quality, PNC's loan loss provision declined by a staggering 56% to $185 million from a year ago. Net charge-offs also dropped sharply, by 38%, to $333 million. At the same time, nonperforming assets fell by 11% to $4.41 billion. The decline in NPAs from a year ago was mainly due to a fall in commercial real estate and commercial nonperforming loans, similar to what we saw at US Bancorp. The tier 1 capital ratio, however, fell to 9.3% due to the RBC acquisition.

The worst looks to be over
PNC had a pretty strong quarter on the whole. Plus, PNC earlier this month announced a 250% increase in its quarterly dividend to $0.35 per share. In line with many of its fellow banks, PNC had reduced its dividend to conserve capital following the financial crisis. But, following the recent round of stress tests, these banks have been given the impetus to increase their payouts. Peers such as USB and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC  ) also raised their dividends. USB raised its dividends by 56%, whereas Wells Fargo raised its by 83%.

Keep a tab on PNC Financial with the help of the Fool's free My Watchlist service.�

To find another excellent regional player, check out our brand-new free report "The Stocks Only the Smartest Investors Are Buying." We invite you to download a free copy to find out the name of a bank that might have interested Warren Buffett in his early days.

2011 Performance Review For 6 High Yield, Large-Cap Energy Utilities

Energy utilities are purveyors of a necessity, usually at government-regulated prices and restricted competition. Due to utility distribution regulations, they are considered generally reliable and predicable businesses, though issues such as the recent renewed concern over nuclear power can occur, as well as market volatility.

Nonetheless, the regulated nature of their businesses tends to make utility dividends reasonably secure, and also designate the equities as classic "widow and orphan" stocks. Their relative security means that the dividends and equity are unlikely to grow at a rapid pace.

Investors looking to double their money in a year or two will rarely look at a utility. Utilities are also generally far less volatile than the broader market, and the demand for utilities only increases over time, as technology advances into new realms and the population continues to grow.

Below are six large cap (over $10 billion) energy utilities within the S&P 500 [Consolidated Edison (ED), Entergy Corporation (ETR), PG&E Corp. (PCG), PPL Corporation (PPL), Public Service Enterprise Group (PEG), Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL)]. I have also included their one-month, three-month, six-month and 2011-to-date equity performance rates (not including dividends paid).

Below is a 2011-to-date comparison chart (click to enlarge):

Several Utilities ETFs are also available, such as the Utilities Select Sector SPDR (XLU) that currently yields 3.88 percent. Additionally, the iShares Global Utilities ETF (JXI) tracks the S&P Global 1200 Utilities Index.

Recent strong performance by most utilities, particularly within the United States, may also indicate that these utilities are overbought in the short-term. Nonetheless, their yields are still well above the broader market's average.

Disclaimer: This article is intended to be informative and should not be construed as personalized advice as it does not take into account your specific situation or objectives.

Disclosure: I have no positions in any stocks mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the next 72 hours.

Jones Soda and Reeds Merger Lacks Fizz

On of my favorite Charlie Munger quotes is 'When you mix raisins and turds, you still have turds.' This statement pretty much sums up my thoughts on the merger of Jones Soda (JSDA) and Reeds Inc. (REED). Since I have historically been interested in Jones Soda for a long time, this is a merger close to my heart; I generally don't like it when my heart is close to turds (as this merger seems to be).

Reeds, having successfully blown through well over $3 million in cash over the past 4 years (leaving them with literally no cash), even after having borrowed a fair amount, is now trading cash and stock for Jones. I surmise that the cash comes from a preferred share offering recently made (though it isn't enough to cover the ~$2.7 million); but the thing to remember is that JSDA, as of their last 10Q, had over $6 million in cash... Meaning that JSDA shareholders are essentially being paid with their own money and stock currency, which I see less value in than the original Jones shares held.

To juice up the deal for Reeds, they have written into the agreement that in the event that they can't pay out the cash, they can further dilute their common stock at a value of $1.70 per share, which is presently less than it is trading at!

One good thing for Jones is that they can get out of the deal via unsolicited bids; maybe Coke (KO) or Pepsi (PEP) will get in on the action as a way to break into the premium beverage industry.

Certainly, there will be synergies that the 2 companies will have. For example, they will save a good deal just in SG&A; JSDA's head won't be part of the new company. There will most likely be further consolidation and the new company will have better bargaining power in acquiring materials, hiring, and shipping. Ironically, Jones failed miserably at selling their products in big chains such as Kroger (KR) and Wal-Mart (WMT), whereas Reeds is expanding it's relationship with Kroger.

I may be missing something here--in fact, I probably am. But let's face it, the directors of Jones have historically made piss poor capital allocation decisions as they presided over the company becoming virtually worthless--not raising a small country's GDP worth of cash when people couldn't get enough of their stock (at ~$30 bucks a share) probably wasn't the best idea...

Personally, I wouldn't buy Reeds stock pre-merger at virtually any price; it isn't that there isn't upside, it is just that I don't see a margin of safety in the company. I will no doubt be impressed if Reeds is able to grow shareholder wealth in any meaningful amount in the near future.

Disclosure: None. Do your own research before doing anything.

Top Stocks For 5/21/2012-17

Dr Stock Pick HOT News & Alerts!

_________________________________________

FREE Daily Stock Alerts From DrStockPick.com

_________________________________________

Tuesday Dec. 22, 2009

DrStockPick.com Stock Report!

TaxMasters, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: TAXS) Earlier this month, TaxMasters reported financial results for the first nine months of 2009. Revenues totaled approximately $27 million, an increase of 87% over revenues of approximately $14 million in the same period of 2008. Net income for the nine month period was approximately $6 million, compared to approximately $1 million for the same period of 2008, an increase of nearly 442%. The company expects to report its financial results for the fourth quarter and full year 2009 on March 31, 2010.

The U.S. Army fired two TALON Laser-Guided Rocket guided test vehicle rounds during the Aviation Multi-Platform Munition Demonstration. TALON LGR is a cooperative development effort between Raytheon Company (NYSE: RTN) and Emirates Advanced Investments of the United Arab Emirates.

Live Current Media Inc. (OTCBB:LIVC), a media company built around content and commerce destinations, today announced that effective December 18, 2009, the Audit Committee of its Board of Directors appointed Davidson & Company LLP (”Davidson”) as the Company’s new independent auditors, replacing the firm of Ernst & Young LLP (”Ernst & Young”). The decision to change auditors was not the result of any disagreement between the Company and Ernst & Young on any matter of accounting principals or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure.

A. Schulman, Inc. (Nasdaq: SHLM) announced that it has named Liu Hao as Sales Manager for China and Mannar Mannan Shanmugam as Sales Manager for India, effective immediately. Both will have responsibility for growing A. Schulman’s customer base in their respective markets, which are key to the Company’s future geographic growth, and both will report to Alice Chan, Business Unit Manager, Masterbatch Asia.

Just in time for the holidays, Vonage (NYSE: VG) has announced an enhancement to the Vonage Mobile application to include the popular Vonage World calling plan. Vonage World Mobile provides customers with unlimited mobile international calls to over 60 countries for one flat monthly rate when calling from their mobile device. This exciting new mobile plan allows users to stay in touch with loved ones around the world without breaking their budget.

Green Globe International, Inc. (Pink Sheets:GGII), the worldwide owner of the Green Globe brand, today announced the launch of Green Globe Certification’s www.greenglobe.com portal. The new information hub brings together all Green Globe Certification services offered in countries and regions around the world, assisting businesses as well as individual travelers discover the best in sustainable travel and tourism.

Sporting Goods Stock Smackdown — Dick’s Vs. Hibbett

�Setting a goal is not the main thing,� NFL Hall of Fame Coach Tom Landry once said. �It is deciding how you will go about achieving it and staying with that plan.� That�s just as true for sporting goods retailers like Dick�s Sporting Goods (NYSE:DKS) and Hibbett Sports (NASDAQ:HIBB) as it is for championship sports teams.

Sporting goods retailers are cyclical stocks — in a weak economy, consumers are less likely to spend money on treadmills and high-end golf clubs. Although sales at sporting goods stores rose 7.2% in September, persistently high unemployment and other woes make that trend unlikely to last.

For major retailers like DKS and HIBB, the keys to riding out the storm will depend on the strength of their business strategies and how efficiently they can execute those plans. Here�s how Dick�s and Hibbett stack up:

Business Model

Dick�s: The DKS business model is like that of a big-box retailer. Most of the company�s 455 stores in the U.S. are in mid-sized and large markets, and stores average 50,000 square feet. Dick�s 81 Golf Galaxy stores average 15,000 feet. The company hopes to expand its store network and e-commerce channel, while driving margin growth through inventory management, private-brand sales, leveraging vendor relationships and �regionalization� — getting the right products to the right stores to boost sales and reduce the need for clearance. DKS� success is based on the �disciplined execution� of its strategy. When the company saw the economy turn south back in 2008, it shifted its focus from earnings to liquidity. The company cut inventory and expenses (including reducing store hours) and accessed $90 million of its $100 million credit line to rise out the storm.

Hibbett Sports: The HIBB business model is more of a boutique approach: Its 802 stores average 5,000 feet and generally are located in malls that often are anchored by a Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) store. Hibbett focuses on small and mid-sized markets in the Sun Belt, Mid-Atlantic and lower Midwest. The company hopes to leverage its small-market strategy to open between 350 and 375 additional stores in the future. HIBB�s keys to success are in deployment of sophisticated information systems to aggressively control inventory and costs, as well as a rigorous sales training program to boost product knowledge and sales skills.

Recent Earnings

Dick�s: DKS last reported earnings Aug. 16; the company�s second-quarter net income rose 43.3% to $78.8 million (59 cents per share), up from $51.5 million (43 cents per share) in the second quarter of 2010. Revenue grew by 6.6% to $1.31 billion, slightly lower than Wall Street expected. Despite the slowdown in sales, Dick�s same-store sales rose by 3% in June and July. The company continues to grow its margins, which rose 1.3% in the quarter to 30.7%. DKS will next report earnings Nov. 14.

Hibbett: HIBB last reported earnings Aug. 19: the company�s second-quarter earnings rose 48% to $5.9 million (21 cents per share), compared to $4 million (14 cents per share) for the same quarter last year. Revenue jumped more than 9% to $151.9 million, beating analysts� estimates of $151.9 million; same-store sales increased by 5.9%. HIBB grew its gross margins by a little more than 1% in the quarter to 33.07%. HIBB will next report earnings Nov. 21.

Fundamentals

Dick�s: DKS stock has a market cap of $4.48 billion and, at $37.23, is trading 13.36% below its 52-week high of $42.97 in May. The stock has a price/earnings-to-growth ratio of 1.19, indicating that it is slightly overvalued. Its balance sheet looks solid, with total cash of $626.41 million compared to total debt of $140.35 million; it has levered free cash flow of $171.58 million. DKS also has a trailing P/E of 18.6 and a forward P/E of 14.3. A stock that has a higher trailing P/E (or �multiple�) usually is viewed as more expensive than a stock within the same industry that has a lower multiple. A lower forward P/E usually indicates an expectation that earnings will grow more than a competitor in the same sector with a higher multiple.

Hibbett: HIBB has a market cap of $1.01 billion and, at $37.78, is trading 12.14% below its 52-week high of $43 in July. With a PEG ratio of 1.13, the stock is slightly overvalued. Hibbett�s balance sheet also looks solid, with total cash of $65.19 million compared to total debt of only $2.45 million; it has levered free cash flow of $48.54 million. Its balance sheet looks good, with total cash of $65.19 million compared to total debt of $2.45 million. HIBB has a trailing P/E of 20.42 and a forward P/E of 16.72.

The Winner

Hibbett by a nose, based on its commitment to a stronger business plan. While Dick�s is much larger than Hibbett and has viewed cost control as a key to boosting margins, its same-store sales growth is about half that of HIBB. Hibbett�s niche strategy — smaller stores, smaller markets, intensive staff training in product, sales and customer service — differentiates the chain so that it doesn�t have to compete solely on price. With a focus on using information technology to cut operating costs and boost efficiency, the company is positioned to retain buyer loyalty — which could pay off big when the economy bounces back.

As of this writing, Susan J. Aluise did not hold a position in any of the stocks named here.

Blackstone Trades in Poisoned Waters

The definition of the word hypocrite, according to Merriam-Webster, is �a person who puts on a false appearance of virtue or religion.� Stephen Schwarzman, CEO of Blackstone Group LP (NYSE:BX), recently wrote the following in the Financial Times: �Unless we end targeted class warfare in the U.S., we cannot solve our economic problems or stop a long period of potential decline.�

There are few people less qualified than Schwarzman to offer an opinion on restoring America�s fiscal balance. Blackstone has single-handedly added to this mess by piling on debt in search of private equity lucre. Owning its stock is hazardous to your health.

Deficit Financing

Schwarzman obviously was talking about everyone but himself when it comes to solving our economic problems. Travelport Holdings Limited, the parent of Blackstone�s majority-owned travel reservation business, released a detailed plan this week that would restructure its $715 million in senior unsecured payment-in-kind loans with interest rates as high as 13.5%. The debt now will be due in 2016 instead of 2012. These moves come in the wake of downgrades from both Moody�s and Standard & Poor�s.

It�s important to note this debt is separate from the $3.2 billion in debt of Travelport Limited, the operating company. When Blackstone Group and its partners acquired Travelport, in August 2004, they paid $4.3 billion for the former Cendant division with just $900 million in cash, the rest debt. Making matters worse, six months later, Travelport borrowed another $1.1 billion to pay a special dividend to Blackstone and company. The $715 million in payment-in-kind debt being refinanced to 2016 is what�s left over from the $1.1 billion.

In the span of six months back in 2004, Blackstone bought Travelport,�piled on $4.5 billion in debt and walked away with 70% of the company as well as money in its pocket. It was a great deal for its partners but a horrible one for Travelport. If this is the kind of fiscal management Schwarzman is talking about, I�ll take my chances with President Barack Obama.

Deal Gone Bad

Creditors of the Extended Stay Hotels chain are suing Blackstone for $8.4 billion, alleging it purposely sold the chain in 2007 to the Lightstone Group for $8 billion — a figure they claim was overpriced to increase the fees Blackstone would receive from the sale. The resulting additional leverage eventually forced the hotel chain into bankruptcy two years later. The creditors also seek punitive damages, which are rare, for Blackstone breaching its fiduciary duties to both the company and its creditors.

While it seems a stretch to prove malfeasance, it is interesting that Blackstone invested $100 million last summer in the group that bought Extended Stay out of bankruptcy for $3.9 billion. Blackstone got a 10% stake for its small investment. If reports are credible, approximately $3 billion was debt. Here�s the irony: Blackstone paid $2 billion for the chain in 2004, including the assumption of $1.1 billion in debt, turned around and sold it for $8 billion less than three years later, and now has bought it back, albeit in a group and for slightly more than it paid seven years earlier. It got lucky with its timing, and now it�s trying to revisit history.

I can fully understand creditors being miffed, especially the U.S. taxpayer, who�s on the hook for $744 million in mezzanine debt that never will be recovered. Blackstone�s second investment in Extended Stay might be bargain basement but it reeks of poor taste. I can think of many reasons why its stock is to be avoided, but the two best are that it hasn�t done a thing right since its $31 IPO in 2007 and, more important, there are better options available.

Safer Alternative

Murray Coleman of Barron�s wrote in a Sept. 14 article that asset managers are trading at a 35% discount to their three-year average P/E of 16.7. Ameriprise Financial�s (NYSE:AMP) forward P/E is 6.9, 37% less than the current forward P/E of 10.9 for asset managers as a group. Its earnings yield is 11.1%, 52% higher than Franklin Templeton (NYSE:BEN). Its stock is dirt-cheap right now, but it won�t be forever. Financial planning might not be as flashy as private equity, but I can guarantee they�re making a far more positive impact on America than Blackstone ever could. If you must own an asset manager, this is where you should start.

How Fast Is the Cash at Home Depot?

It takes money to make money. Most investors know that, but with business media so focused on the "how much," very few investors bother to ask, "How fast?"

When judging a company's prospects, how quickly it turns cash outflows into cash inflows can be just as important as how much profit it's booking in the accounting fantasy world we call "earnings." This is one of the first metrics I check when I'm hunting for the market's best stocks. Today, we'll see how it applies to Home Depot (NYSE: HD  ) .

Let's break this down
In this series, we measure how swiftly a company turns cash into goods or services and back into cash. We'll use a quick, relatively foolproof tool known as the cash conversion cycle, or CCC for short.

Why does the CCC matter? The less time it takes a firm to convert outgoing cash into incoming cash, the more powerful and flexible its profit engine is. The less money tied up in inventory and accounts receivable, the more available to grow the company, pay investors, or both.

To calculate the cash conversion cycle, add days inventory outstanding to days sales outstanding, then subtract days payable outstanding. Like golf, the lower your score here, the better.

Here's the CCC for Home Depot alongside the comparable figures from a few competitors and peers.

Company

TTM Revenue

TTM CCC

Home Depot $69,507 �48
Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN  ) $43,593 �(14)
Best Buy (NYSE: BBY  ) $50,433 �20
Sears Holdings (Nasdaq: SHLD  ) $42,747 �82

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. Data is current as of last fully reported fiscal quarter. TTM = trailing 12 months.

For younger, fast-growth companies, the CCC can give you valuable insight into the sustainability of that growth. A company that's taking longer to make cash may need to tap financing to keep its momentum. For older, mature companies, the CCC can tell you how well the company is managed. Firms that begin to lose control of the CCC may be losing their clout with their suppliers (who might be demanding stricter payment terms) and customers (who might be demanding more generous terms). This can sometimes be an important signal of future distress -- one most investors are likely to miss.

While I find peer comparisons useful, I'm most interested in comparing a company's CCC to its prior performance. Here's where I believe all investors need to become trend-watchers. Sure, there may be legitimate reasons for an increase in the CCC, but all things being equal, I want to see this number stay steady or move downward over time.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FY = fiscal year. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Because of the seasonality in some businesses, the CCC for the TTM period may not be strictly comparable to the fiscal-year periods shown in the chart. Even the steadiest-looking businesses on an annual basis will experience some quarterly fluctuations in the CCC. To get an understanding of the usual ebb and flow at Home Depot, consult the quarterly period chart below.

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FQ = fiscal quarter.

On a 12-month basis, the trend at Home Depot looks good. At 48.0 days, it is 3.3 days better than the five-year average of 51.3 days. The biggest contributor to that improvement was DPO, which improved 2.8 days compared to the five-year average. That was partially offset by a 0.5-day increase in DIO.

Considering the numbers on a quarterly basis, the CCC trend at Home Depot looks OK. At 46.7 days, it is 4.8 days worse than the average of the past eight quarters. Investors will want to keep an eye on this for the future to make sure it doesn't stray too far in the wrong direction. With quarterly CCC doing worse than average and the latest 12-month CCC coming in better, Home Depot gets a mixed review in this cash-conversion checkup.

Though the CCC can take a little work to calculate, it's definitely worth watching every quarter. You'll be better informed about potential problems, and you'll improve your odds of finding the underappreciated home run stocks that provide the market's best returns.

To stay on top of the CCC for your favorite companies, just use the handy links below to add companies to your free watchlist.

  • Add Home Depot to My Watchlist.
  • Add Amazon.com to My Watchlist.
  • Add Best Buy to My Watchlist.
  • Add Sears Holdings to My Watchlist.

How to Avoid Big Losses & Execute Winning Trades Blindfolded

I know this headline just sounds too good to be true, and nobody could blame you if you stopped reading right here.

Consider this, though: “A penny saved is a penny earned” might be a clich�, but it’s accurate. If your stock portfolio is down by $1,000, you have to earn an extra $1,000 to bring your net worth back to even. So a penny saved really is a penny earned.

Now ask yourself, “How much money did I lose since the May highs or the beginning of the year?” To make up for the loss, you’ll have to work extra hours. But what if you didn’t lose any money? You would have preserved your purchasing power and be able to buy at lower prices (if you so chose).

In other words, knowing when to sell a position is equally — if not more — important than knowing when to buy. Buying low and selling high (or the opposite if you are shorting the market) require serious insight about the market.

Here is one simple strategy that protects your profits and helps you identify winning trades without having a clue of what the market — whether Dow Jones, S&P, Nasdaq or Russell 2000 — is going to do next.

Below you will find some actual trade recommendations. The number in front of the trade recommendation corresponds with the number in the chart. Red numbers were sell signals, green numbers were buy signals.

Blind as a Bat But on Target

Bats have poor vision, but they always find their target simply because they work effectively with what they’ve got. Nobody has “stock market radar vision,” so we too have to work with what we’ve got. We need to identify an edge and exploit it.

Every person may have a different “edge.” My edge is knowing the S&P’s hot buttons — levels that tend to force the S&P to change trends or confirm a trend (the red and yellow lines drawn in the chart show some hot buttons).

Imagine a car driving on a long road with a few traffic lights. If the car is going to stop, accelerate or make a U-turn anywhere on the road, it most likely will be at a traffic light. If the S&P is going to reverse, it likely will be at support/resistance.

I spend much of my work hours identifying support/resistance levels. Trend lines, Fibonacci, pivots, sentiment, prior highs/lows, etc., are important tools to identify such hot buttons.

The Big One

Like a home builder that starts out with the foundation and the frame, I start out by “building” a rough, big picture outline.

The chart below explains why a major market top was expected.

The ideal target range for this top was 1,369 to 1,382. This resistance cluster was made up of Fibonacci resistances and the upper trend line of a multi-decade bearish M top formation.

1) (See chart for corresponding number) on May 1, I confirmed that a move to 1,369 would be close enough to consider the right side of the giant M-pattern as completed. The very next day, the S&P spiked briefly to 1,370.58 before reversing.

The Roller Coaster

The May 2 high was followed by a three-month roller coaster finished off by a meltdown. There was a temporary bottom at S&P 1,258 on June 16.

2) On June 15:

The 200-day SMA at 1,257 is sandwiched between the 1,255 Fibonacci projection level dating back to 2002 and last week’s at 1,259. Last Wednesday’s low was at 1,261.9. If this low is not enough, there is a strong cluster of support at 1,259 to 1,245. A drop into the 1,259-to-1,245 range would prompt us to close out short positions and leg into long positions.

The Curveball

3) Unfortunately, no strategy is perfect. On July 4, I suggested to short the S&P at 1,340 with a stop-loss at 1,348. On July 6, I added, “If the S&P does spike above and falls back below 1,347 we will re-enter the short trade. If the S&P stays above 1,347 we’ll watch and wait for a day or so and may go long. However, if the S&P moves higher the VIX will be around 15. Owning stocks with the VIX that low is a risky proposition.”

In a not-so-unusual effort to clear out stop-losses, the S&P closed above 1,348 for one day before reversing. In seesaw situations like that, investors need to be flexible and sometimes close and re-enter positions.

4) I took one more stab at going long at S&P 1,300 and got stopped out at 1,330. To emphasize, all long positions were closed at 1,330 on July 27. From there on, the stock market went down hill.

5) I had already forewarned that “due to the potential debt-related down side, aggressive investors may go short if the S&P drops below 1,325.”

Forget Your Personal Preference

Even if your personal outlook differs from technicals, it’s best to stick with technicals. I learned this when I wrote on July 27, “For some reason I still can’t get myself to abandon the prospect of higher prices. Nevertheless, support was broken and the S&P saw a failed daily percentR low-risk entry today, so we’ll go with the (bearish) flow.”

6) Just a day later, the possibility of panic selling became real. A July 28 update: “A break below the 200-day SMA and the trend line may trigger panic selling. One way to avoid missing out on a potentially big opportunity is to use the 200-day SMA at 1,284 as delineation between bullish and bearish bets — buy as long as the 200-day SMA serves as support, sell if it becomes resistance. If the S&P seesaws, repeat the process.”

New Lows or Not

The big question is whether the decline is over and done with or if there will be new lows. Based on various patterns, such as the 2007 market top mirror-image, VIX topping pattern, market bottom patterns and sentiment, the low doesn’t seem to be in yet.

But I trust technicals more than my personal bias. 1,173 was major support. Tuesday’s update recommended to go short when the S&P violates 1,173. As long as the S&P stays below, we will be looking for lower prices. Worst-case scenario, we’re proven wrong and have to close out the positions without net gain at 1,173. Ideally, we’ll get to close out short positions once the S&P reaches our downside target.

This approach to investing isn’t foolproof. But allowing the market to establish support resistance levels along with incremental trading ranges makes it possible to maximize the gains and minimize any losses.

This article is brought to you by ETFguide.com. ETFguide is the information leader on exchange-traded funds because of its vendor-neutral approach and its progressive reporting style. Unique features include an ETF bookstore, a monthly e-mail newsletter, and subscription based ETF portfolios.

This Week In ETFs: May 6th Edition

This week proved to be a rather�disappointing�one as worse-than-expected jobs data�shocked the markets, forcing the Nasdaq to its biggest single-session drop since November. The Dow Jones Industrial Average shed 1.27%, while both the S&P and Nasdaq logged in their worst weekly performances of 2012. The violent drop was spurred by less than cheery non-farm payrolls data, which came in at 115,000 jobs in April, well below the predicted 170,000. As outlooks worsened, European stocks fell sharply alongside U.S. equity markets. Worries about a weakening economy coupled with easing tensions between Iran had oil prices in a free fall on Friday, leading the commodity to plummet 4% to $98.49 per barrel.�This week’s market upheaval has left many investors on shaky grounds as they continue to digest and�analyze�the overall health of the global economy [see also 15 Different Ways To Invest In Energy With ETFs]. �

The ETF industry considerably slowed down its pace this week with only one new fund hitting the markets. Bond giant PIMCO expanded its actively manged lineup with the launch its new Global Advantage Inflation-Linked Bond Strategy Fund,�ILB. The new ETF invests in inflation-protected bonds that are “economically” tied to at least three developed and emerging market countries [see also FINRA Fines Big Banks And The Indonesia ETF Is Now 5% Cheaper].

Below we outline three of the best ETF stories from around the web this past week:

How To Invest In The World’s Fastest Growing Countries at Money And Markets:�

Amidst ongoing economic uncertainty, investors have struggled to both find and maintain any kind of lucrative profits. However, one corner of the market has proved to be a surprising bright spot for investors: high growth foreign investments in countries such as Guinea, Azerbaijan, Qatar, and Angola. In this article, author Ron Rowland discusses how investors can use ETFs to invest in some of the world’s fastest growing countries.

4 ETFs That Own The World at Market Watch:

For investors looking to establish a tactical tilt towards a specific region or country, there are numerous ways to utilize ETFs to slice and dice allocations to meet anyone’s investment objectives. However, for those who wish to achieve more broad-based geographic diversification in their portfolios, there are over 154 global ETFs to chose from. In this article, author John Prestbo highlights 4 ETFs that could be suitable for worldwide equity exposure.

5�Simple ETF Trading Tips�at ETF Database:�

With the numerous and�growing�number of benefits that ETFs offer, it is perhaps not�surprising�that the exchange-traded�structure�has become one of the most popular vehicles of choice for many traders. Despite its cost-effectiveness, transparency, and�relative�ease, there are a number of mistakes investors make when trading ETFs. This article, by Stoyan Bojinov, outlines 5 simple trading tips every investor should consider before their next ETF trade.

Follow me on Twitter @DPylypczak

[For more ETF news, make sure to sign up for our�free ETF newsletter�or try a�free seven day trial to ETFdb Pro]

U.S. stock futures consolidate; Citi, MetLife off

Reuters People walk past a Citibank branch in New York on February 17, 2007.

NEW YORK (MarketWatch)�U.S. stock market futures consolidated Wednesday following Wall Street�s rally in the prior session, with Citigroup Inc., MetLife Inc. and SunTrust Banks Inc. under pressure in pre-open action after falling short in the Federal Reserve�s bank stress tests.

Stock-index futures remained nearly unchanged after government data showed U.S. import prices climbing 0.4% last month from January, just under expectations. The first increase was chalked up to the recent spike in energy costs.

Futures on the Dow Jones Industrial Average � pared gains, lately up 5 points to 13,114.

Futures for the Standard & Poor�s 500 index �slipped 0.5 point to 1,390.2. Nasdaq 100 futures �fell 1 point to 2,693.

European stocks provided a positive tone, taking a cue from the strong close for Wall Street on Tuesday, with the Stoxx Europe 600 index XX:SXXP �up 0.6% to 271.20.

Click to Play Fed: Banks can withstand downturn

The Federal Reserve cleared the way for many of the nation's largest banks to raise dividends and buy back shares as it released the results of its latest round of "stress tests." (Photo: Getty Images.)

On Tuesday, the Nasdaq Composite COMP � closed above 3,000 for the first time in 11 years. The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA �rallied 217.97 points, or 1.7%, to 13,177.68, its largest one-day jump since Dec. 20, 2011, and highest level since December 2007.

The gains were inspired after strong retail-sales data and after the Federal Reserve, as expected, kept interest rates at record lows. The Fed also said it sees the U.S. economy slowly gathering steam.

J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. JPM �also fed into positive sentiment after lifting its dividend.

Banks will be in focus on Wednesday, with not all the news so upbeat. Late Tuesday, the Federal Reserve released results of its stress tests, which measure the ability of financial institutions to withstand another credit crisis such as that of 2008.

In an otherwise largely positive result for U.S. institutions, Citigroup C and SunTrust Banks Inc. STI �were among those that failed under a measure gauging how much capital they have set aside. Shares of Citi were down more than 4% in pre-market trading as SunTrust STI �dropped 3.6%.

MetLife MET �failed under a so-called �total capital ratio� test, and those shares fell 3.7% in pre-open. Read more on Fed stress test

Fawad Razaqzada, market strategist at GFT Markets, said the failures of Citi and MetLife on the stress tests could fuel downside pressure for Wall Street.

�This could well be compounded by the fact that the U.S. economic calendar is set for a relatively quiet day ahead, leaving traders otherwise struggling to find some meaningful direction,� Razaqzada said in emailed comments.

With earnings news now thin on the ground, said Razaqzada, �the question now will be that given the Dow has made the jump well clear of 13,000�a level that provided repeated resistance in the second half of February�can the rally be extended?�

In other corporate news, shares of Cheniere Energy, Inc. LNG � fell in pre-open trading after the company said it will sell 17 million shares of common stock in an underwritten public offering. Read more in Stocks to Watch.

Shares of FXCM Inc. FXCM � climbed after the online currency trading firm reported fourth-quarter results that topped estimates

In commodities, gold futures for April delivery �were under pressure, down $50.40, or 3%, to $1,6543.80 an ounce, as a lack of clues on future easing measures from the Fed dented interest in risk-averse investments like gold.

And April crude �fell 49 cents to $106.22 a barrel, also in electronic trade.

The dollar edged higher, with the ICE dollar index DXY �standing at 80.364, up from 80.231 late Tuesday.

Trina Solar Shares Popped: What You Need to Know

Although we don't believe in timing the market or panicking over market movements, we do like to keep an eye on big changes -- just in case they're material to our investing thesis.

What: Shares of Trina Solar (NYSE: TSL  ) are shining bright today, up by as much as 16% after receiving an analyst upgrade from Auriga.

So what: Auriga upgraded a slew of other solar players in kind, including SunPower (Nasdaq: SPWR  ) , MEMC Electronic Materials (NYSE: WFR  ) , Suntech Power (NYSE: STP  ) , and Yingli Green Energy (NYSE: YGE  ) . SunPower, MEMC, Trina, and Yingli all now carry buy ratings, while Suntech was only granted a hold rating.

Now what: MEMC was previously considered a hold while the rest were considered sells, so the upgrade shows a stark contrast to Auriga's prior ratings. All of the upgraded shares are seeing healthy upside today amid a broadly upbeat day, but Trina is enjoying the biggest gains. Auriga also bumped its price targets on all of the companies accordingly, raising Trina's from $3.50 to $9, which represents a 30% premium to yesterday's closing price of $6.91.

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Trading Corner: This Seasonal Trade Has Been a Winner the Past Ten Years

I'm always on the lookout for the right combination of fundamental and technical factors to get a trader's edge.

Look carefully at the following two charts -- the first covering the last three months of 2008 and the first three of 2009, and the second covering the year-earlier period -- and you will see a pattern.  Have you detected it?


In this instance the trading instrument is the closed-end fund Morgan Stanley Quality Municipal Securities (NYSE: IQM). In both charts, there is a bottom between the October and December period and then a strong rally into February. On the top chart the advance took the fund from below $7 to more than $11, a gain of about +57% in less than five months. In the second chart the advance went from just below $11 to approximately $12.70, roughly a +15% gain.

 

When I checked price data for IQM going back to 1999, I found the same pattern: Without exception, the fund bottomed between October and December and reached a short-term peak in February.  In some years, such as 2008-2009, the gain was spectacular.  In others the advance was more in line with the +15% recorded in 2007-2008.

How do you explain this consistent pattern?  One word: "seasonality."

You may be familiar with the concept even if you haven't described it with that term. Some examples: The Santa Claus Rally, in which stocks often rise in the week between Christmas and New Year's Day; September -- traditionally a month to beware; the October bottom, and "Buy when it snows and sell when it goes." All of these "seasonalities" encapsulate the idea that the market has an upward bias between November and say April.

The problem with attempting to trade on seasonality alone is that traders eventually anticipate the pattern and then it has less punch.

Take the January Effect, wherein small-cap stocks have unusually high returns in January, outperforming their large- and mid-cap brethren.  According to this pattern, small-cap stocks typically decline in December and come roaring back in January.

As investors have increasingly factored this information into their trading, it has become more difficult to profitably trade this phenomenon.  The problem is traders anticipate other traders' anticipation and the pattern loses part of its punch.

My wife, Dr. Carla Pasternak, writes two investment newsletters, municipal bond funds -- of which IQM is one -- did far better in January than at any other time of the year.

In January, the average fund return was +2.21%, while in the other 11 months they were down - 0.19%. The study was conducted tracking the performance of 168 municipal bond funds over a 10-year period, from 1990 to 2000.

The authors explained this aberration by noting that holders of these closed-end funds did tax-loss selling in December. Investors in muni bond funds were, in their words, "among the most tax sensitive by self-selection;" they reduced capital gains taxes by selling their holdings in muni bond funds if they had profits to offset.

Since closed-end muni funds are held roughly 95% by individuals and only 5% by institutions, this individual selling had a huge cumulative effect. In January, when the tax-loss selling ended, some of the sellers from December might re-establish their holdings. The uptrend typically lasted into February, at which time there was a correction.

MS Quality Municipal Securities closed today, December 7th, at $13.13.  Its net asset value (NAV) was $14.08, so the fund was selling at a discount to its net asset value of more than 6%.  In essence, that is like buying $1.00  in assets for about $0.94 cents.

The average credit quality of IQM's portfolio is AA-, which is high investment grade. As of Friday, the fund was yielding 6.10%. Since muni bond holders do not pay federal tax on their income they were receiving what is called a tax equivalent yield of 9.38%. Not bad, considering that savings bank deposits typically reward you with less than 1%.

The fund pays $0.07 in monthly dividends. If you are a very short-term trader, you may not have collected many dividends previously but, hey, they, too, help fatten the balance in your brokerage account.

A chart covering trading in IQM from October 2009 to Friday is below.  Note that the same seasonal pattern present in the past 10 years is again unfolding. The shares bottomed in October and are trending gradually higher.


Friday's candle is called "shaven bottom-shaven top" and shows strong buying.  I am going to set a tight stop-loss near the top of the recent band of sideways consolidation at $12.69. My target on the trade is $14.24, which would represent roughly a 15% advance from the October low. As of Monday's close, I am risking $0.42 to make $1.13, roughly a 2.7:1 ratio.  

Note that this fund moves like a tortoise than a hare. As the chart shows, a large range day is only $0.20 or $0.30.  If you take this trade you will need to be patient.